2015: My Gaming Year In Review

2015 was not a banner year for me gaming-wise.  Compared to all of last year, I've already finished 2/3 as many games less than two full months into 2016. I can blame the slow gameplay of the second half of the year on crazy overtime at work. But even on days when I got off work on time, I just felt drained, with very little desire to do much of anything. I rarely even had energy to sit and watch a movie for two hours, much less play a game that requires active interaction. And don't get me started on my lack of drawing.

2014: My Gaming Year In Review

Wow, it's already May and I'm just now getting around to my 2014 gaming recap. I've sat down to write this blog entry several times, but I either get distracted by other things or simply can't gather up enough energy to make the effort. Sadly, that's a pretty accurate reflection of my gaming these days.

So, I'll jump right to the stats before something else comes along...

Sitting This One Out: Pre-Sequel Apathy

Borderlands 2 is one of my favorite games of last generation. If pressed to make such a decision, I'd probably say it was tied with Saints Row The Third for the top spot on my list. Between the 360 and PS3 versions, I spent over 300 hours on Pandora. Only the Elder Scrolls games brought me anywhere close to those numbers.

And yet, with Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel releasing this week, I feel my interest in the new title to be next to zero.

My 2013 in Games

So much for blogging more... This is the first blog entry I've made in two months, since I resolved to write more to get the most out of my new computer. But I suppose the new year give me a new opportunity to try again. I'm not going to make a fancy declaration, just a casual determination to have the most productive year ever. And since this blog only received less than 20 entries in two years, it really shouldn't be too difficult to surpass that. We shall see, of course.

Looking back at 2013, it was pretty productive clearing out my backlog. A little too productive, perhaps...

Stepping Away From The Big Reviews

I love making comics. I enjoy obsessively playing video games. I like writing so much, I often have a stupid grin on my face while I'm typing at my computer. And I relish any opportunity to discuss video games.

So why did the prospect of writing another in-depth review of a video game derail my motivation so much that I had to take a lengthy hiatus from my creative endeavors?

Perhaps it's my straight-forward approach to the subject matter. I set out to avoid the snarky writing that's a staple of the internet era. As a result, I wrote reviews that were devoid of much excitement. I don't regret taking my reviews seriously, but maybe it was too much against my nature.

I always struggled with the level of information I included when drafting a simple game analysis. I know it's not my job to explain every feature in a game, but was I giving enough info to justify why I love or hate it so much? Do I need to spell out every aspect of a funky new multiplayer mode if I'm just going to dismiss the addition with a written shrug? I'm naturally long-winded in my writing; brevity is something I've awkwardly attempted to juggle for years, usually failing spectacularly. These reviews brought out the worst case of rambling I've contracted in a long while. For every sentence of information I added, I felt I needed two more to be consistently thorough in my reporting. This caused a seemingly endless loop of revisions to rearrange earlier paragraphs now that I had decided to expand on concepts I had already touched upon.

This process dragged out the writing process so much that it became the main source of delays in my comics. I could play a video game, be inspired for a comic idea, draw the full comic and then... it would sit there. The process of arranging my thoughts into a complete and somewhat-concise review sometimes took longer than all the other steps combined. Often the looming dread of having to organize my thoughts would be enough to stutter my creative impulses, to make me not even want to play games. It just had to stop. I had to stop.

So that's where I stopped. But I miss the comics. I started drawing Those Games We Play as a way to fuse my passions of playing games and making comics. And I'm going to return to making the comics, and they'll remain  focused on games like they always have been. But the full length reviews are out. I'm sticking with the 3-4 sentence blurb reviews that accompany the comic strip, but none of the over-long blog types. That's definitely not to say I'm out of the rambling-blog business, far from it! I have a lot of video game related topics to passionately babble on about. Especially with the Next Generation of consoles arriving next week. I want to reflect back upon the last few years of gaming, about lessons learned, about changes to my gaming habits, and about my hopes for a bright, glimmering future. From time to time I may even write something that essentially an in-depth review, but only when I'm emotionally invested in the subject and not just because it's my routine.

Video Game Review - Star Trek (2013)

Although I enjoy the movies, and was a big fan of the Deep Space Nine television series, I don't really have much experience with Star Trek video games. I played Legacy on the 360 a few years ago, and found it to be rather dull, with sluggish, awkward space navigation. I also have faded memories of shooting geometric shapes vaguely resembling Klingon Birds of Prey in a Star Trek game on my parents' Vectrex. That was the game with the giant Space Sombrero, right? Regardless, I didn't bring much enthusiasm with me to this creatively-titled new Star Trek game.

Licensed games are always at their worst when they tie into a movie, as they're usually locked into a production schedule to match the film's release date. You'd be hard pressed to find such a game that couldn't greatly benefit from a few more months of work. But here's a game that could have used a trip back to the drawing board.

Video Game Review - Bioshock Infinite

The original Bioshock was an amazing game. It was incredibly immersive and had plot twists that left me speechless. The creepy atmosphere was so well-crafted that my horror-movie-loving girlfriend refused to be in the room while I played it because Rapture's residents freaked her out with their insane ramblings. The sequel focused more on the action rather than the story, which was a wise decision as trying to recapture the original game's uniqueness would have been folly. Bioshock is back, but with a new setting, and a chance to strike a new chord in gaming history.

The story seems rather straightforward; the protagonist, Booker, is sent on a mission to free Elizabeth from her fairy tale imprisonment in a tower, part of the not-so-perfect society that exists in the cloud-based city of Columbia. The phrase "Bring us the girl and wipe away the debt" is intertwined in the story as much as "Would you kindly" was part of the first Bioshock. When you finally meet up with Elizabeth, you begin a rocky relationship filled with compelling conversation and useful scavenging. Perhaps the most remarkable thing about escorting Elizabeth through the increasingly violent streets: she's a boon, rather than a burden, even during combat. Not only can she pick locks and open magical "tears" to provide useful objects, she'll also find money and ammo to help you out in your time of need. And best of all, she manages to stay out of harm's way while bullets are flying. When the game separates you from her, you will definitely miss her presence.

Video Game Review - Defiance

I don't have much experience with MMOs. The most time I've spent with one is the handful of hours I had with DC Universe Online back when it launched. That game pretty much met with the expectation I had for all MMOs... constantly respawning enemies, lots of characters running around apparently directionless, and just general chaos. I didn't have high hopes for Defiance, a game I knew very little about going in. But nothing else new was launched that day, so it won my attention by default.

The game ties directly into a new show on SyFy (it always pains me to type that stupid name) that it set to launch April 15. For those keeping track, that's two weeks after the game launched. Not being able to see the show while I was playing the game made me wonder how much of the plots are similar. Are all of these characters part of the show (aside from the player-controlled "Ark Hunters" of course)? There were a couple "episode" missions with characters I know are from the show: Nolan, a bland Han Solo wannabe, and Irisa, his freaky-eyed cohort. Wikipedia says Nolan is a lawman on the show, but he sure seemed like just some treasure hunter in the game; the three of us teamed up to recover some pricey crystal. There promises to be more free episodic content, presumably with these characters, which is something I look forward to.

Video Game Review - Forza Horizon

I'm not a big fan of simulation driving games. I look for more outlandishness in my car-based gaming: arcade-style driving, taking corners at crazy sideways angles, smashing opponents out of the way, and Frenchmen surrendering as I careen into them. The Forza series is none of that, and I've always shied from the franchise because of it. I did play Forza 4, because I'd always heard about the quality of the series, so I thought perhaps it was enough to get me into a game type that always eluded my interest. I was wrong. I found it dull, and an extreme chore to play race after race. I'm just not into cars, and driving faithful recreations of them is a bland proposition. I left the game unfinished, with no desire to ever return.

So, a year later, when Forza Horizon came out, I was wary. It was touted as a more arcade-style entry to the series, but I was still haunted by the previous game that nearly broke my spirits. But, I play damn near everything, so Horizon was given a shot. And I'll be damned, I like it a lot.

Video Game Review - Gears Of War Judgment

Gears of War: Judgment is an odd beast of a game. In many ways, it feels like a rejected piece of DLC from a previous entry; too many changes to satisfy the expectations of the hardcore Gears crowd. And yet what holds back this game from greater heights is its reluctance to go far enough to leave any significant impact on the franchise.

Judgment is the story of Kilo squad: veteran Gears Baird and Cole, along with newcomers Paduk and Sofia. This story is a prequel to the rest of the series, supposedly set shortly after "Emergence Day" although you wouldn't know that just by playing. While the city isn't quite as war-torn as series regulars are used to, there's nothing really to indicate how long they've been actually fighting the Locust. Everyone seems unfazed by these monstrous creatures, and just as well-suited for battle as any of the other games. That's one of the biggest missteps of the conception of this game... its insignificant timeline makes this whole effort meaningless. Why couldn't we play an unprepared squad that encounters the very first wave of these fierce beasts? Or even give us a storyline that ends with the events that led Marcus to wind up in the jail cell that we met him in back in the original Gears?

Video Game Review - The Unfinished Swan

Whenever I find myself amazed by a video game's graphics, it's usually due to some fancypants trick with shiny particles, crazy lens flare, or near-realistic cutscenes. And yet, The Unfinished Swan manages to be constantly awe-inspiring with the simplest of graphics.

The first time I started the game, I thought it had frozen up on me. I was given this blank white screen with a tiny, nearly-unnoticeable circle in the middle. I moved both control sticks around, yet the screen stayed the same. I pressed all the face buttons, but nothing seemed to do anything. Except I could hear faint grunts from a child.

Video Game Review - Tony Hawk Pro Skater HD

It's good to see Tony Hawk games back on the right track. Now they just need to travel a bit further down the line.

I got into the series back on the original Xbox with Tony Hawk Pro Skater 4. The next several years, I would make it a tradition to pick up the new game as it released in October, usually lining up perfectly with Toys 'R Us's annual buy two get one free sale. They didn't grow substantially between each release, but I enjoyed getting back to that familiar playstyle with new maps. That's all I really needed.

American Wasteland and Proving Ground were rough patches, but I had no idea the series would bail so completely with the ill-conceived board peripheral games. I championed for Activision to embrace the HD collection route that's brought back so many last-gen titles. I envisioned one collection being the first three Pro Skater titles (all featuring the two minute objective-based levels), then a second collection containing #4 and the two Underground games. At last, all Tony Hawk games would be available on the 360, and the world would be in balance.

Well, it didn't work out quite that way, but it's still great to finally have some real Tony Hawk action again. Granted, it shouldn't be trumpeted as the second coming, but it helps fill a void.

Like I said, I really got into the series with number four, which left behind the small, timed arenas in favor of spacious, well-crafted, over-the-top stages. I played some of Pro Skater 3, but disliked the time restraint. So it was ironic that the saving grace of the ugly, juttery American Wasteland was the return of the classic mode. It gave me a new appreciation of those bite-sized levels. So now with Tony Hawk Pro Skater HD, a mash-up of the first 2 Tony Hawk games, I feel right at home. I just never would say I was good at it.

There are seven levels, only one available at the start, and completing a set number of goals on a level will unlock the next stage. It's not a cumulative unlocking, however, so completing more tasks on earlier stages won't speed up the level-unlocking process. But the more goals you complete, the more money you'll earn to upgrade your character with higher stats, more special tricks and alternate boards. But these unlocks only apply to the single skater. You'll have to play through the whole game time and again if you want to max out everyone, including your PANXE (Xbox avatar). That's what we call artificially inflating the game content, an age-old gaming tradition. I would have preferred more stages, as this selection feels too light, and I fear its set up just to be bombarded with DLC.

It is a bit difficult to go back to this time before all the expansive tricks from later in the series. I can actually handle not having the combo-extending Revert, which is planned as DLC (talk about game changing... if it's usable in these old stages, high scores will no longer be a challenge). And, sure, it'd be nice if I could control the camera, so I could actually see a collectible that's slightly out of my eyeline before attempting a manic jump. But what I really miss is the wall-plant, so I'll stop splattering violently against walls. Oh, and the ability to level out your skater when they take a crazy arc off a halfpipe. Fancy flatland tricks are missed, as is the ability to switch lip & grinds tricks (without an ollie in between). Also, you can only equip 5 special tricks... what's up with that??

But for older players, those that played the game in its earliest days, this will fit you like a comfy old pair of jeans. Perhaps it won't feel exactly like you remember, but the nostalgic memories will come rushing back. It's like playing Super Mario Bros after a decade away... it's easy to remember where all the gaps and goals are. But that familiarity is puzzling to me. As I mentioned, I never played the first two Tony Hawk games. So why do all of these levels seem so very familiar? I know a couple of them have definitely been around in HD form before, in American Wasteland. Have the others been recycled too?

Another disadvantage I had going into the game, having not played the original games, I had never before encountered the "Big Drop" indicator. If you aren't holding down the A button when you land, you will crash (though if you can land in a grind, you'll be fine). It's not very intuitive, as it will often pop up a split-second before impact.  This must be something they did away with pretty early in the series, as later games featured many areas that would launch you to ludicrous heights, from which you could land with your spine totally unfazed.

Tony Hawk games never were graphical powerhouses, especially with the character models, but the graphics here are fine. They never distract from the game. There are the same odd random glitches that I've come to expect from this series... weird collision problems, random sideways physics (especially at bowl-shaped ramps), and sometimes my character will just decide to fall down. A few times I've even had my A button stop working during gameplay on the Hanger level. It's not my controller because it still works to navigate the pause menu, it just decides it won't let me jump anymore until I start a new round. It's quite inconvenient, I must say.

The lack of local multiplayer is a shocking absence. I might have never picked up the series if I hadn't played some Graffiti Tag at my friend's house. Now, someone else might be missing out on the franchise because they can't play a game without the competitive pressure of Xbox Live. As it is, I found the online multiplayer to be very unstable. I only got into two games, across more than a dozen attempts. Even then, everything moved sluggishly. And the second game never actually ended... when the time ran out, everyone just got locked in place.

Other modes include a pellet-hunting mode called Hawkman (I didn't like it when I tried it in Tony Hawk's Proving Ground, and I still don't like it here), a survival mode that requires you continue doing tricks or your head will explode, or just an untimed practice mode. Also, if you complete every goal on every level, you will be given even more challenging "Projectives". Beat all of those for a sizable gamerscore achievement.

Like the recent Goldeneye remake (another Activision joint), it's obvious this game was not designed to ignite interest from new players, but rather to rekindle the flame of old fans. There is no tutorial mode to help newcomers. There is a map in the pause menu to help find all the goals, but it's not dynamic so even completed goals are still left marked to add confusion. You'll also have to dig deep in the menu system to find a trick list... there are goals that require a specific trick, but it won't list how to perform it. There's no create-a-character, or create-a-skatepark, or even create-a-custom-music-tracklist (Much to-do has been made about the pared down tracklist. None of it really appeals to me, so I just run my own music off my hard drive).

All and all, it's fun, and worth your time... IF you're a hardcore Tony Hawk fan. They should have named it Pro Skater Lite, as there's not a lot of real game here. It's missing so much, especially to draw in a new crowd.

  

2.5 out of 4 Stars.

Recommended for: The Tony Hawk Elite. Those guys putting up the million-plus runs on these two-minute course are exactly who this game is for.

Franchise Fixes: I'm still holding out hope for a complete THPS 4 thru Underground 2 HD Collection (not remake). If they want to "fix" this game, however, perhaps a few free DLC levels would be in order.

Achievements/In-Game Rewards: The vast majority of this achievement list is for the gifted players. I only got the token few for unlocking each level in career mode. Aside from unlocking bonus characters, and cheats (which will disable achievements), there's not much rewarding going on. A sick score will have to be its own reward.

Video Game Review - Super Hero Squad: Comic Combat

Oh, Squirrel Girl, you deserve so much better than this.

Marvel Super Hero Squad: Comic Combat is one of the few games exclusive to the infamous uDraw game tablet, the failed peripheral that nearly sunk THQ. And if all the uDraw games were this bad, its failure is a good thing.

Previous Super Hero Squad games were somewhat dull and tedious, but adding the control scheme from Hell makes you forget all about the boring monotony. Combat is equivalent to a strategy game, where you tell your troops where to go and who to fire at, then you watch them do it. The characters in this game are not well trained soldiers, and simple navigational directions get blundered as they struggle moving around obstacles or even each other. And when they get to the general area that you directed then to, they'll often immediately disperse, wandering off towards random things like a distracted toddler.

You can select a character to control individually, or the entire crew (up to three "Squaddies") at once. Using your stylus, you simply click a spot where you'd like them to go. Simple, yet trying to move then offscreen is a tedious affair.  You can touch the edge of the visible area and slowly plod them along as the screen area moves with them.

If an enemy or breakable item is on the spot where you click, they'll attack it. Ranged characters will often move away from the target, so that they're attacking at maximum distance. They don't seem to care that moving away puts them in the line of fire from something else, such as the stage where there's a GIAGANITC LASER firing down the center of the screen. Also, if the enemy they're shooting at is knocked down, they'll be out of range, so they'll just stand around like there's nothing to do. Any melee character you brought along will be on his own until you manually command his buddies to rejoin the fray. If there wasn't a way to make the A-I smart, then they should have included a general "attack" command.

 

There's also no defense maneuvers at all, with the exception of certain characters special moves that can heal or briefly block damage (Generally, men's special moves attack, women heal. Not the most progressive game). At least, I assume the bubbles Invisible Woman puts around her teammates are shields. The game is also horrible at documentation.

There's no help menu, and nothing to explain what anything is, aside from generic tutorial instruction early in the game. The small game manual mentions the coins (or "issue sales") you pick up in-game unlock items like upgrades and alternate costumes. Nowhere is there anything to indicate if you have everything. Everybody has one alternate outfit, and I think my powers are all up to level 2, but there's no list to tell me if I should be expecting more or not. I don't even see any place to tell me if my powers are really level two or not, the last pop-up I noticed said "Orb Attack upgraded to level 2". I guess that's good? Who knows.

 Besides moving around Squaddies, you can activate draw attacks with your stylus, by sketching a quick path from a character. They will then fire a projectile attack, or melee-only characters will perform a rushing attack. The problem is, it's only really effective if the enemies are standing still. And most projectile attacks won't go further than the first enemy. Hope nobody's standing in the way of the person you really want to hit.

You also have "Glyph Attacks" (I only know they're called this because the manual says so).  You can draw a circle to get an Orb that you can roll around to damage enemies. Drawing a triangle makes a decoy to distract enemies. And an "X" will create a bomb. Seems easy enough. Expect the game has a lot of trouble distinguishing your attempts to draw a glyph from you just clicking to move your characters. At least two-thirds of the time, my attempt to draw something is misconstrued as a movement command.

The only other abilities you have are one-time-use Earthquake and Zipper-Rift power-ups. The Earthquake is the only control I had no problem using. Simply shaking the tablet back and forth activates this powerful attack. The Zipper-Rift is the opposite story. It's activated by placing your thumb and finger on the tablet and performing an "un-pinching" motion. In theory. I only got it to work easily once. Every other time, I struggled for nearly a minute trying to get it to work. By then, most of the enemies were gone. It is an absolutely idiotic concept to make you suddenly use your fingers when playing the game. It should have been activated simply by clicking the zipper icon. Keep. It. Simple. This game has the worst controls I've ever encountered, and would have benefited greatly from just being another standard controller-based brawler.

I have to give some credit to the writer for actually making the storyline specific to the uDraw tablet. Instead of just slapping a game with hideous tablet controls, the entire storyline revolves around Dr. Doom discovering "you" helping the Super Hero Squad with your "power pen". He plans to cross into your dimension to steal the pen. It's a lot of filler, as his minions gather supplies he needs, and when he achieves his goal, it's a very brief, unfulfilling fight. There's also some inane sub-plot in the cutscenes with Dr. Doom's mom bothering hm. It has absolutely no bearing on the story whatsoever. You never fight her. She's just there to annoy her son. That's the entire game: brief, annoying, and unfulfilling. The entire game, including achievement hunting, is completed under five hours.

Graphically, it's blasé. Same Super Hero Squad graphics (which were never impressive) in much smaller play areas. There's some amusing voice acting, I assume it's the same actors from the cartoon. A lot of repetition in the dialog, of course, but I'm amused by Squirrel Girl walking around saying, "Have nuts, will travel!" And I did laugh at dimwit Hulk's answer to a certain riddle.

There's other poor programming oversights: Being disconnected from Xbox Live while playing resulted in being immediately kicked back to the main menu; There's no sound during the credits, no music or anything; And there's no explanation to the Heroic Feats. I figured out the icons for finding the comic stash, and not dying during a panel. But what's that third icon mean? And does accomplishing these feats reward you with anything at all?

All in all, this poorly programmed mess is a total kick-in-the-groin to those of us who love Marvel Comics characters.

1 out of 4 Stars

Recommended for: fans of Squirrel Girl. This is her first video game appearance. I wouldn't recommend actually playing it, but having it there in your SG shrine would be its best use.

Franchise fixes: since the uDraw tablet has been discontinued, the SHS games should go back to the old formula, just focus on making them more fun to play.

Achievement/In-Game Rewards - As I mentioned, this is a quick 1000 achievement points for whoever wants to put up with the shoddy control scheme. Aside from a single alternate costume for each character, the game lacks much reward for its players.

Video Game Review - Frogger Hyper Arcade Edition

Frogger is back, and more neon than ever.

Frogger Hyper Arcade Edition is the classic Frogger gameplay, decked out in new skins to fit your graphic tastes. You can choose how you like your Frogger action to look: the retro giant pixel look, neon colors filling the screen, or even graphics based on other classic Konami franchises. You can also choose from a selection of tunes to cross traffic to, with clever frog puns for their titles. Finally, choose between control style of single hop, or continuous hopping (while pressing a direction, not actually constant movement, thankfully), and you're ready for the old fashion Frogger gameplay you've known and loved for the past 30 years.

And I do believe they made the game easier. I was never all that great at Frogger. Looking at my achievements on the original XBLA port of Frogger, it seems I never beat level 2. I got to level 4 on Hyper, and boy was I proud of myself. But I played a round from the old XBLA title to see if I had just gotten better over the years, but as soon as I started up that game I saw the difference. It had more obstacles, all moving noticeably faster. It's rather misleading that this new version is called "Hyper" when it is much more leisurely paced.

The timer is your greatest threat. While playing, if the time hits zero, you lose. Not just the life you're on, but it is game over regardless of how many Froggers you have in reserve. That's quite harsh. And also the reason I didn't make it past level 4.

The core game mechanics haven't changed, so veteran Froggerites will ease right in. It may take newcomers a while to get used to the infamous collision detection. There's still that invisible block around the cars on the road, and jumping into a seemingly safe spot too close to the rear of a car causes death. It's definitely, undeniably Frogger.

And really, that's what it comes down to... if you've enjoy classic Frogger, you'll enjoy this colorful remix. But there's not much here to draw in Frogger haters.

Sure, there are a few new modes.

There are some paint-by-numbers missions to draw a picture while avoiding traffic and not touching unmarked squares. Not very difficult; once you paint a spot, it stayed that way even if you touch it again. The timer is the only thing really you have to keep in mind.

There's a multiplayer Battle Royale mode, where you actually use a button! Your objective is to kill/outlast the other players. This is accomplished by either grabbing the lady frog power-up, giving you a few moments to squash your fellow frogs, or by picking up colored flies which grants you powers to screw with other players, leaving them more susceptible to oncoming traffic. It's not very deep, as there are no defensive powers. It's all just a matter of getting to the power-ups first.

Other modes include steering two frogs to safety simultaneously, trying to colors as many tiles as possible, and even a challenge mode that makes you duplicate feats you may have done before, but on a much stricter timer.

There are a few poor decisions with the menu navigations, leading to unnecessary annoyances. Challenge mode does not offer a "next" option after you complete a challenge, instead making you go back to the challenge selection screen, where you must scroll through them all starting with the first challenge, to find where you left off. There's no "random" for the music selection, so you're stuck with the same song repeating over and over while you're in a level. The unlockable movies are hidden in the Help & Options submenu, rather than being out where they could be accessed as an actual feature. Small things like this can really add up, and a little more work on the user interface could have easily circumvented these issues.

This game really tries to be the equivalent of the recent Pac-Man Championship Edition games, but there's just not enough content to hold your interest for long. The problem is that its content is pretty much all available from the get-go. Pac-Man CE had you unlock things as you played through it all, which kept you coming back for more. If Frogger Hyper Arcade Edition rewarded you for getting so far on each stage with each skin, there'd be more incentive to stick around longer.

You can see and do pretty much everything this game has to offer in an hour or two. Then it's just a matter of how often you'd like to go back to the classic mode, as if you were playing original Frogger. Still, it's probably the best version of the old game yet.

2.5 out of 4 stars.

Recommended For: gamers who love these classic arcade titles, and who are keeping the Konami Code alive!

Franchise fixes: Honestly, I've never been convinced that Frogger is very viable in today's market. His original 2-d static-screen platforming still works, but it really hasn't grown, nor is there a call for it to do so. This game adds some flourishes and superficial extras, but that's really as far as I can see this franchise going without sacrificing Frogger's core and becoming the horrible crap that his last-gen 3D games have been.

Achievements/In-Game Rewards: The only unlockables in the game are the Frogger movies (featuring  "Frogger In Love" shorts, reminiscent of Pac-Man cutscenes) and a couple skins for classic mode. The Achievement list is easy pickings for any Frogger fan.

Video Game Review - Dead Island

Dead Island is one of those games that you just want to keep playing a little more, and a little more, and a little more...

It's not a well-written masterpiece, by any means. The cut-scenes range from "What is going on?? Who is that guy??" to a head-slapping "WTF?!? Did I miss a plot point somewhere??" The main characters are flat and have no emotional arcs or any real involvement in the storyline. They're just there to kill things and be bossed around by everyone they meet.

But the combat is visceral and exciting. Once you get the basics of combat down and find yourself a hearty weapon, the thrill of killing hordes of zombies is undeniable. A well-timed expertly aimed swing of a sharp blade can decapitate a zombie instantly. A savage swing of a blunt instrument can reduce an enemy's bowling arm to a floppy, useless appendage. And as your character is upgraded, you can unlock a head stomp that will kill any knocked-down foe, even "special" zombies.

Add in modified weaponry with fire and electrical upgrades, and cruise around with a full four-player team? You're in for a night of a fun, unstoppable zombie smackdown rampage.

And it looks great! There's an impressive number of character models. That's not to say you won't occasionally see two identical brain-biters charging at you, but there is a very nice variety of zombies and survivors. And thanks to the first-person perspective, the models are huge and all the bloody details look fantastic in high definition! And while the main characters have personalities composed of tired clichés, their visual design is top-notch, each looking distinct and unique to the game. Too bad they don't offer some different outfits; zombie killing is always more exciting with a little dress-up.

The game can easily be compared to Left 4 Dead or Dead Rising, but it distinguishes itself as more of a gritty brawler, and somewhat casual open-world action game that just happens to have many, many zombies. I call it a brawler, because 98% of the combat will be close-quarters. There are guns, which only become available later in the game, but they're not nearly as effective against the undead. The limited amount of ammo you can carry makes firearms only reasonable choice against human opponents who are shooting back. Yes, it wouldn't be a zombie game without human bad guys spoiling the "let's stick together" atmosphere.

I wish there were some more hand-to-hand fighting techniques, though it would sacrifice some of the realism if you were busting out wrestling moves on zombies ala Dead Rising. One character, Sam, has a Charge move, which essentially knocks over anybody he runs into. But otherwise, if you're without a weapon you can punch zombies with your bare fists or you can kick them for minor damage. Kicking can knockdown most enemies, and they'll take more damage while on the ground (more importantly, they can't fight back until they return to their feet). One thing you have to be extremely aware of: your stamina. If you played the game upon release, kicking took no stamina, so you always had that as a last resort when you tire yourself from swinging your giant axe around. But the developers have since patched the game making kicks use stamina, like everything else.

The game is filled with very interesting choices made by the developers. Most of the time I'm totally unsure if they were conscious decisions, or if they were merely oversights, or perhaps they just ran out of time/budget. For instance, there are almost no ambush moments. In a game like this you expect certain dark corners to be hiding a zombie ready to lurch at you as the game intentionally directs you into its path. Or as you go into a building to retrieve a quest item, common gaming knowledge tells me to expect bad guys to show up behind me to try and stop me. Maybe a big betrayal will occur when I take this item back to the quest giver and I'll have to fight him for it. But these things don't really happen. It's bizarre, and initially it seems disappointing. But then again, it seems to fuel the uniqueness of the game. It's trying to be less of a "game" and add more realism to the desperate struggle for survival rather than adding a lot of convenient gameplay clichés. Even the couple "boss battles" are hardly such... they absorb extra damage, but really not all that much.

And I'm not sure I've played a game with less penalty for dying. You do lose some of your money... five or ten percent, maybe? But you'll regain that after looting a few corpses. And you'll usually start within about 30 feet of where you died (Unless you're wandering... I've noticed that if I've veered away from the course of an active quest, my respawn will be a lot closer to the quest objective than I was). You won't loses your inventory, and slain enemies are still dead. It's quite generous and helps keep the fun going. No rage-quitting here.

The game is absolutely meant to be played co-op. It's much more fun and exciting to have help around, and even some impromptu zombie-killing competitions. And since the cutscenes all involve the entire group, it makes more sense if you're actually playing with a full crew (NPCs also refer to you in the plural sense). What's impressive is that you're given free reign around the very large maps. You're limited to being in the same area map (such as Act 1's resort area, or Act 3's jungle setting) as the host, but these things are huge! Everyone can be off completing separate quests, or teaming up to power through them one-at-a-time. The only time you need to all be together is to fast travel to other locations, to enter buildings/sewers that have their own play area, and at certain points in main storyline quests. But don't believe the original packaging... this game is online (or system link) co-op only. No local co-op options, which is really disappointing. This game is best shared with a buddy.

Leveling up gives you access to a wealth of character-specific upgrades. These allow you to do more damage with specific weapon types; use less stamina; gain more XP, and so on. Each character also has a Rage ability. When activated, your vision goes stylistically black & white, with enemies glowing red. You have unlimited attacking ability while Rage is active, using your character's weapon specialty to deadly effect.

The missions are limited in scope, almost all are fetch quests, with a few escort or clear-the-area missions thrown in for good measure. But the size of the five maps gives you a good variety to travel around, even if you are doing essentially the same things over and over.

There is a strange decision to make the "storage locker" be a character that's heavily involved in the storyline. At times, she's off being part of a mission, meaning you have no access to your storage! You won't even meet up with her until the end of Act 1, which is several hours into the game. So, if you're on a second playthrough, you can't access your saved loot until you reach that point of the game. Bizarre choice.

There are some bugs with the game. Aside from the occasional lag you might experience online, there's not too much that's incredibly bothersome. However, there is one mission where you have to escort "Jin" to a bunker. I played the mission on three separate playthoughs, and every single time, she glitched out. Twice, she got knocked down and ended up with her head in the sand like an ostrich. The other time, she just stopped walking for no reason. I had to reload a checkpoint and it proceeded without hitch from there.

Overall, I had an incredibly fun time with this game, so it deserves my highest recommendation. I played so much of it when it came out, I had to stop myself to give other games a chance. And when I recently got into it again, to join a friend on his playthough, it quickly became an obsession again. I can't wait until they make the sequel!

4 out of 4 stars.

Recommended for: everyone not put off by graphic head-splitting zombie violence.

Franchise fixes: Couch co-op would be nice. Customizable characters would be a huge bonus. More weapon mods, with power ratings listed on the description. Just more of everything would make it a bigger and better game. And I'd like to see a scenery change so this island doesn't just get rehashed.

Achievements/In-Game Rewards - I got the full 1000 core achievement points for this game, thanks to a fun list. A bit of grinding is offset by a variety of specific tasks, such as setting 10 zombies on fire at once, or getting 10 headshots in a row. Apart from the regular RPG-type upgrades, there's not much else as far as in-game rewards.

Video Game Review - Lollipop Chainsaw

It's amazing how much Lollipop Chainsaw feels like Grasshopper Manufacture's previous game, Shadows Of The Damned.

They appear quite different on the surface: The main protagonists are different ages, genders, and attitudes; Damned is a shooter, Lollipop is (mostly) a combo-heavy hack'n'slash (more reminicent of Grasshopper's No More Heroes); Lollipop is filled with bright, candy colored visuals, Damned... not so much.

However, on closer inspection, the similarities are obvious: Damned hero Garcia Hotspur is a Demon Hunter, Lollipop's Juliet is a Zombie Hunter; They each have a chatty sidekick that's mostly inanimate; Damned is a battle through Hell, In Lollipop, Hell comes to Earth. The shop system is practically identical, the levels equally straightforward, and game designer Suda 51 injects the same "WTF?!?" brand of humor.

When coming up with game ideas, could they not decide on which characters, settings and gameplay mechanics to use, so they decided to just make two games? Is Lollipop considered a spiritual sequel to last year's Damned? Whatever the reason, I'm truly happy with the end product. And if Grasshopper keeps making new IPs, I hope it ultimately leads to some mega-Suda-51-crossover-smackdown game.

Lollipop Chainsaw is the story of cheerleader & expert zombie hunter Juliet Starling, who arrives at school one morning to find the undead filling the halls. Her boyfriend, Nick, is victim of a zombie attack and ends up a decapitated head dangling off Juliet's waist. Together with Juliet's zombie-stomping family (though they don't actually provide much direct help), they will fight the hordes through six stages, complete with the standard boss battles.

The combat system is a mix of light pom-pom attacks and strong chainsaw moves, with the requisite dodging suitable for an agile cheerleader. These attacks can be bolstered by using gold coins (called medals) won in combat to buy powerful combos. As you progress through the storyline, an upgrade for your chainsaw will be presented to you, allowing your chainsaw to be used as a gun. Seriously (This also makes me wishful for a sequel to Bulletwitch).  You will also gain the ability to use Nick's head in a number of ways, though it's limited to one-time-use "Nick Tickets" that are rarely found, but available for purchase in the store. Unfortunately, using a Nick Ticket activates a roulette, and if you aren't good at stopping the spin where you'd like, you might end up activating a less-helpful Nick ability.

Levels are designed to leave little room for exploration, sending you through on a linear path. Boss battles at the end of each stage are a mix of active combat and button prompts.

Graphics are colorful and appropriately sparkly, but the designs of the characters and backgrounds aren't very memorable. Same with the animation; it works well, but just seems like it's been recycled from a number of other games. The sole exception to the mediocrity is Juliet herself. She obviously received full attention in the character design and animation stages. The game rests on her playability, and it truly shines. As does her voice acting. Veteran voice actress Tara Strong does a remarkable job bringing Juliet to life. She's supplied with some highly amusing dialog as well. Her brief conversations with Nick about his favorite color and if he wants to have a baby are downright hilarious.

I do have a few quibbles with the decisions made for the gameplay... What is the obsession with making me actively cut through a door?? That concept stopped being interesting two console generations ago. It was a big annoyance in games like Spider-Man Edge of Time, and they fixed it for The Amazing Spider-Man. When will Grasshopper stop relying on such an archaic "gameplay" extender? If there's a door I need to kick open or chainsaw through, let me press a button once and then watch Juliet take care of the rest on her own. I'm not in danger of being attack or dying if I fail to get through in time, so there's no reason for strenuous activity when I could better use this moment to get a drink.

There's also a "Sparkle Hunter" bonus that pops up whenever you kill 3 or more zombies with one move (or if using the gun, within a certain time... I guess? It doesn't seem to be well defined). When this happens the screen turns bright pink and with rainbows and glitter and such, as it shows you cutting through those zombies and everything else disappears for a moment. You also get bonus Platinum Medals, used for unlocking concept art, music, and costumes for Juliet. My problem with this is that is stops the action too often. Aside from the fact that I often get hit as it returns to normal because if the disorientation, but if you're good at this game, you'll be seeing this so often it becomes quite an annoyance. A simple pop-up announcing your multikill, without interrupting your game flow, would be so much less intrusive.

I would have liked to see less linear game progress. After you finish the first stage, it shows you all the bosses on the map, but will only let you play them in order. There's no real reason for this. They could have provided you with the upgrades and story dialog between stages, regardless of what order you chose. Instead, you're unnecessarily stuck with the order they give you.

Aside from that, there's an occasional problem with the camera, and at times it seems like Juliet isn't doing the combo you're telling her to do (it couldn't possibly be a fault on my end!!). But that's stuff pretty standard troubles that unfortunately I've gotten used to in games.

The game does feature an impressive number of unlockable costumes for Juliet, though they cost a lot of platinum medals, so you'll be grinding a lot to afford them. There's alternate cheerleader outfits, incredibly skimpy bikinis, and some cosplay costumes from what I'm told are Japanese cultural icons. The American-inspired ones, such as one based on Ash from the Evil Dead series, were (so far) strictly pre-order bonuses. Too bad, because Ash seems to me to be the most directly related to the gameplay.

Some people may take issue with how short the game is: Six Stages, plus a prologue. You can run through it in four to five hours. It almost feels designed like a twin-stick shooter, equivalent to something like Deathsmiles.  You'll be replaying stages to grind out medals to unlock everything. Perhaps this should have been marketed at a more budget price? Sixty dollars seems steep for this amount of game and its unimpressive secondary designs. $40 would have been a good starting point. Or perhaps it could have made an impact with $5 episodic stages?

Lollipop Chainsaw provided some good times, and a few great laughs. But apart from Juliet herself, the game has a bit of a cranked-out feeling.

Also... crazy stereotypical characterization aside, why doesn't Juliet's father, the supposed bad-ass head zombie hunter, actually do anything helpful? Maybe they're planning some Dad DLC to explain what he was up to while Juliet was actually fighting things. Though I'd prefer Sniper Sister missions. Then again, both those things would lack Juliet which is the best part of the game, so maybe that type of DLC isn't such a good idea.

3 out of 4 stars.

Recommended for: fans of combo-heavy Hack & Slash gameplay, though waiting for a price drop would be beneficial.

Franchise fixes: Since I mentioned it, I would like to see a full-fledged cross-over game featuring Juliet in other character's game worlds. It would break up the monotony of the zombies.

Achievements/In-Game rewards: A rather dull list of do-everything, collect-all-stuffs, get-high-scores. No avatar awards or other such unlockables. The multitudes of costumes for Juliet are about all to really strive for.

Activision's Time-Release Strategy

Activision seems to have yet another strategy to get gamers to keep their games, rather than selling them off right away. This attempt to circumvent the used game market involves doling out special content slowly. And I think it wasn't planned out very well, as it seems designed to actually hurt the all-important first week sales.

Prototype 2 & The Amazing Spider-Man games released with essentially locked content.

Prototype has RADNET: Individually released challenges that awards prizes - avatar items for Xbox 360 users, exclusive themes for PS3 owners. Starting a week after release, they would dole out a new challenge pack once a week.

Spider-Man has spider-symbols hidden around its open world city map. Finding these will reward you with a spiffy alternate costume to wear. Each of these symbols only becomes available after a certain date.

My question is, why are they punishing early adopters of their games? If I buy a new game, I'm (hopefully) excited about it and rush home to play it and eagerly play through it as soon as possible. Had I had this extra content available from the get-go, I would have enjoyed trying it out. But once I finished the experience, I move on to something new. Personally, I'm the type to keep my games, so I can replay anything I get the urge to experience again. But hiding content behind a time lock appears designed simply to annoy me, the eager consumer. I'm not sure I want to go back to those games that crippled my experience in such a way.

And, it's true, you can mess with your console's clock settings to make it think that it's August to get all your Spider-Man goodies now. But akin to rewarding cheaters for finding a way to break your system.

 

 Presumably, this whole procedure is designed to get consumers to keep their games in their collections, rather than trading them into used game stores while the value is at its apex. But realistically, it will drive the informed consumer to wait until all the content is available before purchasing it, at which point the price has probably dropped. In fact, in today's market, very few games don't reach the $20 mark within six months of release; whether it's part of a sale or a permanent price cut.

So, if I have to wait until August (two months after release) to get all the Amazing Spider-Man costumes, maybe I'll just keep waiting until I can get it really cheap, right? And if everybody hold off on buying it upon release, the price will plummet really fast as panicked retailers try to scrape this pariah of a game off their shelves. That doesn't seem like a winning marketing strategy.

Circumventing the used game market is a difficult task, to be sure. Most attempts have a greater risk of alienating your first-run  consumers. But punishing early adopters is essentially what is happening here. Those are the people that they need to be rewarding.

Instead, why not have these bonuses be unlocked for free the first week of release, perhaps as an automatic reward for just starting up the game? Procrastinating players would have to complete tasks to unlock them later, or maybe just purchase them as DLC. It's not a perfect solution, of course... they'd probably need to make the unlock part of an in-game download so players can't use the clock-cheat to unlock the costumes. It'd also be a problem to recode that part if the game was delayed. And what if you ordered a game from an online retailer that took more than a week to ship your package?

The system is absolutely flawed. It needs to be closely re-examined to properly adjust who it truly is that it wants to target.

Video Game Review - Fable Heroes

I thought a game about puppets would be more entertaining.

Fable Heroes is a 4-player brawler, devoid of any actual narrative. You move from one level to the next over the playable area of Albion. Most levels have a fork in the road, allowing you to choose how you'd like to end the level: a boss fight or a minigame. Neither choice alters the route of the game. You'll still play through the same handful of stages, before unlocking "Dark Albion", which features "dark" versions of the exact same stages for you to play through again.

 - They tried an interesting concept with one stage: Named "The Cloud", this stage was initially locked until the player community reached a certain benchmark in earned gold. However, it was reached within a couple days of the game's release and is now open to play. It's an odd thing to think about… What if the game failed to sell? This level would just be sitting there? And now that it's permanently open there's nothing special about it. It was sort of there to punish early adopters. Day One players weren't able to play the whole game. But they could have helped to unlock it. A weird experiment, but ultimately short-sighted.

You have several characters to choose from: Four to start with, a handful more to unlock as you progress through the game. You'll also choose your three A-I teammates, if playing alone. Most are melee characters, but there are a couple ranged fellows. You can also unlock the powerful Jack of Blades, which features both fighting styles. Aside from one basic attack, you have a much slower Flourish attack. You'll need to spend in-game gold to level up your attack speed, strength and range. The dodge-roll button will be your best friend when battles get chaotic.

You play as a wooden puppet version of "your favorite characters from the Fable Universe". That presents a problem for me, since I never made much of a connection with any character in the Fable games. I liked my farty show-off create-a-character that I molded throughout each game. That was a highlight of the Fable series, being able to be your own character, to make choices that affect your life and your story. None of that is in this game. They could have at least let me play as my PANSE (Xbox Avatar).

Aside from ignoring the core foundation of Fable, they seem to have gone to great lengths to make this experience as dull as possible. Aside from the aforementioned fork in the road at the end of the levels, the stages are frightfully linear, as you literally walk down the street, unable to interact with houses or backgrounds. There are no combos to your attacks, just a basic attack and a flourish. You can purchase an upgrade to get a finishing move, which you will have to unlock for every group of enemy types.  The most exciting part of the game is building (and keeping) your multiplier so you earn more money. Killing enemies, or finding multiplier bonuses in treasure chests will raise your multiplier, while getting hit or going too long without making a kill will decrease it. Of course, it starts with a pretty low maximum until, you guessed it, you buy the upgrades. It seems like this game was designed as a micro-transaction affair, though thankfully the end product does not take any money beyond your initial Xbox Marketplace transaction.

While the graphics and animation are all solid, they do lack any special qualities. I think this again is due to the limits of the franchise it draw upon. For me, Fable doesn't necessarily have its own recognizable art style. It's just sort of a semi-cartoony version of historic English villages, maybe a little steampunk thrown in here and there. And while the look of Fable games is connected to that certain era, that historic period isn't connected necessarily with Fable. So, this just looks like it could be any game. It's Fable? If you say so.

The stages, besides being lackluster and linear, are too spaced out. Groups of enemies pop out at certain areas, and in between there are usually long stretches of road with nothing to do but break barrels for coins or open treasure chests for mostly useless prizes like balloons that drop a couple coins when popped (as opposed to just letting you have the coins) or turning you into a slow-moving giant for a time. Remember how the multiplier decreases when you aren't actively killing enemies? With these huge gaps in between enemy groups, it's obvious the game is against you getting those high scores.

The simplistic combat and straight-forward level designs are not the unfriendliest part of the game, though. That award would go to the unlocking system. Between levels, you are placed on a square game board. Your performance on that level awards you with a number of dice rolls. To unlock an upgrade, you must land on that tile and then spend your hard-earned gold on the new perk. However, there are usually three upgrades on each tile, so you'll have to land on that same space three times. But the spaces don't disappear when you complete them, so as you near full completion, you'll be wasting your rolls trying to land on that last elusive space.

 

You'll also be in charge of upgrading your A-I buddies. This means you can work on upgrading all your characters four-at-a-time this way, though you will probably need to give them some of your gold (by going to a certain spot on the game map) because their take will likely be significantly lower than your own (which also means they'll get less dice rolls to use on upgrading).

Once a character finally purchases all of their upgrades, they move to a special section of the board where they spend their gold on one-time perks such as invincibility, to be used on the next played stage. These are also governed by luck, having to land on them instead of just being able to purchase them outright. A more user-friendly game might have just put these tiles on the board in place of the fully-purchased upgrade tiles. Actually, a better game might have just made a store for your characters to pick and choose what they wanted to buy whenever they wanted!

One other thing, on a technical side... while the game played well, the A-I characters would routinely disappear and reappear. Almost always this would happen mid-level at a giant object you're supposed to smash to get coins. Sometimes they won't reappear. But they'd still be there, totally invisible, because later in the level I'd see enemies getting beat up with no one around them. A bizarre glitch.

So, who is this game for? Sometimes it feels like it used to be a Facebook game, other times it feels like it was being geared for Kinect controls. It seems very much marketed to a young childhood audience, yet it's based on a series that has been very much Mature rated so far. I know Fable 3 had a more-simplified combat system from the previous games... is this game the ultimate goal they were heading for? Are they telling us that the upcoming Fable: The Journey (with its lower Teen rating) is not at all intended for long-time series fans? I just hope it's not as dreadfully dull as this game was.

1.5 out of 4 Stars

Recommended for: Kids that aren't very picky.

Franchise fixes: This could have been a great game, it just needs some amount of depth. It's cute, but it's not cute enough. It could be a good brawler, but it needs something more. A story, perhaps? Unlockable combos?

Achievements/In-Game Rewards: The achievement list is nice and varied, though you'll have to read it to know what to do, as it wants you to use specific options in specific levels. The game even comes with a couple nice Avatar awards: a shirt for completing the first stage, and a Jack of Blades mask for fully upgrading the Jack of Blades character. Too bad, beyond new characters, the in-game unlockables aren't great.

Video Game Review - Bejeweled Blitz Live

Bejeweled Blitz Live is yet another obsessively addictive puzzle game from Popcap, available through Xbox Live Arcade. It is a stand-alone version of the Lightning Mode from Bejeweled 3, and similar to the version of Blitz available to play on Facebook.

This version of the sparkly gem-matching puzzle classic will absorb your free time with the greatest of ease. The strict one-minute timer will test just how well you can handle the pressure of a countdown. If you've played any iteration of Bejeweled before, you'll ease right in, though the changes may take some getting used to.

Mainly, the control scheme, while quite brilliant in its obvious simplicity, is quite different than that of the old game. The face buttons now indicate which direction to move the selected gem. For instance, moving the cursor over a gem and pressing X will switch that gem with the one to the left, the A button will move it downwards, and so on. It works marvelously, once you get the hang of it. Though a lot of long-time Bejeweled players will balk at this revolutionary control scheme.

Other changes include lightning gems, which are formed by getting five gems in a row (or T or L shapes). These powerful items will obliterate their entire row and column when detonated, usually guaranteeing a multiplier being dropped on to the board. These multipliers, which show up whenever a certain amount of gems are removed from the table in a single move, are key to racking up crazy scores in such a short time.

Also new: online multiplayer. You can either go head-to-head with one person, with both game tables on the screen at once (though you really don't have time to be watching their board), or with up to a total of 16 players in Party Play mode. The party mode displays only your game board, but a graph shows everyone's gamerpics as they move upwards in real time.

While these new features are great, there are a few things missing from the features list.

If you've ever played Bejeweled Blitz on Facebook, you'll notice something's missing. The Boosts which you could purchase with in-game currency are gone, as is the entire coin-earning system. This significantly reduces scoring opportunities, and was an unnecessary removal. They could have easily kept them in and simply increased the high score achievement goals to compensate.

Another dramatic change from the free Facebook version: the timer no longer stops while the gems cascade to fill holes. This robs you of precious seconds while you wait to see how things are going to line up. They likely made this change for purpose of adding Online multiplayer, so everyone is on the same clock… but I would have preferred if everybody's clocks stopped each time rather than never.

One other major addition was made for the XBLA version… Twist mode. I've never played Bejeweled Twist, so I don't know how the blitz version compares to the regular, but I'm loving it here. You have to enter a different mindset  than in Classic mode, as you are rotating blocks of 4 gems at once (I recommend using the triggers for your rotation controls in this mode). You're still matching 3 or more gems, but you're no longer limited to only making moves that make matches. Instead of relying on lucky drops where you can use them, you can move gems wherever you want, one rotation at a time. I average twice the score in Twist mode than I do in Classic. Once you get the hang of it, it is great fun. More addiction awaits you!

Only having to commit to a minute of gameplay at a time is a fun break in your day, though playing for an hour really burns my eyes with all the sparkling gems, flashy effects and pulsing screen effects.

Overall, I enjoy this game quite a lot. The addition of Twist mode really helps offset losses from the Facebook version. However, it's value is decreased with a similar product included in the full version of Bejeweled 3. Twist mode is a fantastic inclusion, but with only 2 modes, fans of the series may feel a lot's missing.

3.5 out of 4 stars

Recommended for: Puzzle gamers, fanatic and casual alike, as well as anyone wanting a game to help train their power of observation.

Franchise Future: As much as I like the game, it is a bit short on game modes. In the future, I hope they stick with releasing full proper versions of Bejeweled.

Achievements/In-game Rewards: Bejeweled Blitz Live come with a pretty straight-forward list of achievements, for making gems for the first time, to achieving certain score & level benchmarks. I played off and on for over a year before finally ranking up to Level 50.